Modern Crypto Trader
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Business
Politics

Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing

by admin November 6, 2025
November 6, 2025

A federal judge criticized the Justice Department for allegedly being too quick to indict in high-profile cases on Wednesday.

Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick of the Eastern District of Virginia made the comments during a brief hearing regarding the case against former FBI Director James Comey.

‘Right now, we are in a bit of a feeling of indict first, investigate later,’ Fitzpatrick said in the hearing, which lasted less than an hour.

Fitzpatrick questioned prosecutors about their handling of data acquired from a number of search warrants between 2019 and 2020, information which is now being used in Comey’s case. The judge pressed prosecutors on whether they may have viewed information that may be protected by attorney-client privilege.

Fitzpatrick also noted the size of the trove of documents, saying Comey’s defense team has been placed at a disadvantage with a limited time to view the set.

‘The government has had this for five and a half years … this is an unfair burden the government is placing on the defense, but I don’t see another path forward,’ the judge said.

Comey’s team has sought to have his case dismissed, arguing he is the victim of selective prosecution by President Donald Trump.

The DOJ denied in a 48-page filing that Trump’s September Truth Social post calling on U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute prominent political adversaries, including Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, had any influence on the decision to bring charges.

‘These posts reflect the President’s view that the defendant has committed crimes that should be met with prosecution. They may even suggest that the President disfavors the defendant. But they are not direct evidence of a vindictive motive,’ prosecutors argued.

‘The defendant spins a tale that requires leaps of logic and a big dose of cynicism, then he calls the President’s post a direct admission,’ they continued. ‘There is no direct admission of discriminatory purpose. To the contrary, the only direct admission from the President is that DOJ officials decided whether to prosecute, not him.’

Fox News’ Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Democrats see mandate after 2025 wins — Republicans say it’s a mirage
next post
October monthly job cuts surged to a 22-year high

Related Posts

Supreme Court hands Trump victory on transgender passport...

November 7, 2025

Top Democrat backs US intel on narco-trafficking strikes,...

November 7, 2025

House Democrat sides with Trump officials on air...

November 7, 2025

CLAY TRAVIS: The GOP’s 2026 challenge — holding...

November 7, 2025

Optimism fades as Senate Democrats dig in, hold...

November 7, 2025

House conservatives back new funding deal to end...

November 6, 2025

Bill Gates discovers the way to fight climate...

November 6, 2025

Bernie Sanders crashes Schumer news conference, criticizes Democratic...

November 6, 2025

Democrats see mandate after 2025 wins — Republicans...

November 6, 2025

How Trump projected US power across Indo-Pacific before...

November 5, 2025

Stock

  • Chart Mania – 23 ATR Move in QQQ – Metals Lead 2025 – XLV Oversold – XLU Breakout – ITB Moment of Truth

    July 26, 2025
  • Momentum Leaders Are Rotating — Here’s How to Find Them

    July 25, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    July 25, 2025
  • Is META Breaking Out or Breaking Down?

    July 24, 2025
  • A Wild Ride For the History Books: 2025 Mid-Year Recap

    July 24, 2025
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Thank you

Copyright © 2025 moderncryptotrader.com | All Rights Reserved

Modern Crypto Trader
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Business