{"id":1670,"date":"2025-06-02T17:31:05","date_gmt":"2025-06-02T17:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/02\/maxine-waters-campaign-to-pay-68k-for-violating-campaign-finance-laws\/"},"modified":"2025-06-02T17:31:05","modified_gmt":"2025-06-02T17:31:05","slug":"maxine-waters-campaign-to-pay-68k-for-violating-campaign-finance-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/02\/maxine-waters-campaign-to-pay-68k-for-violating-campaign-finance-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Maxine Waters campaign to pay $68K for violating campaign finance laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">Progressive California Rep. Maxine Waters&#8217; campaign has agreed to pay a $68,000 fine after an investigation found it violated multiple election rules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">The Federal Election Commission (FEC) said the longtime House lawmaker&#8217;s 2020 campaign committee, Citizens for Waters, ran afoul of several campaign finance laws in a tranche of documents released Friday.<\/p>\n<p>The FEC accused Citizens for Waters of &#8216;failing to accurately report receipts and disbursements in calendar year 2020,&#8217; &#8216;knowingly accepting excessive contributions&#8217; and &#8216;making prohibited cash disbursements,&#8217; according to one document that appears to be a legally binding agreement that allows both parties to avoid going to court.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Waters&#8217; committee agreed to pay the civil fine as well as &#8216;send its treasurer to a Commission-sponsored training program for political committees within one year of the effective date of this Agreement.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Respondent shall submit evidence of the required registration and attendance at such event to the Commission,&#8217; the document said.<\/p>\n<p>Citizens for Waters had accepted excessive campaign contributions from seven people totaling $19,000 in 2019 and 2020, the investigation found, despite the maximum legal individual contribution being capped at $2,800.<\/p>\n<p>The committee offloaded those excessive donations, albeit in an &#8216;untimely&#8217; fashion, the document said.<\/p>\n<p>Waters&#8217; campaign committee also &#8216;made four prohibited cash disbursements that were each in excess of $100, totaling $7,000,&#8217; the FEC said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The campaign committee &#8216;contends that it retained legal counsel to provide advice and guidance to the treasurer and implemented procedures to ensure the disbursements comply with the requirements of the Act.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Leilani Beaver, who was listed as Citizens for Waters&#8217; attorney, sent the FEC a letter last year that maintained the campaign finance violations were &#8216;errors&#8217; that &#8216;were not willful or purposeful.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, has served in Congress since 1991.<\/p>\n<p>The new movements in the probe were first reported by OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"pdf-container\" style=\"height:860px\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>It is not the first time, however, that Waters has generated public scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>In 2023, a Fox News Digital investigation found that Waters&#8217; campaign paid her daughter $192,300 to pay for a &#8216;slate mailer&#8217; operation between Jan. 2021 and Dec. 2022.<\/p>\n<p>It was reportedly just one sum out of thousands that Waters had paid her daughter for campaign work.<\/p>\n<p>A complaint that Waters&#8217; campaign had accepted illegal campaign contributions in 2018 was overwhelmingly dismissed by the FEC in a 5-1 vote.<\/p>\n<p>Fox News Digital reached out to Beavers, Waters&#8217; congressional office and Citizens for Waters for comment.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Progressive California Rep. Maxine Waters&#8217; campaign has agreed to pay a $68,000 fine after an&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1671,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moderncryptotrader.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}